The War on Women in Africa

Societies and cultures across the globe are highly variable, always dynamic and constantly changing. This evolutionary process is not only limited to the biological makeup of things but also ideas and way of life.  One of the most fascinating areas to explore are the two key demographics that have been the basis of civil rights battles—gender and race. Pick and choose any society in the world and there are still questions and attitudes lingering from within whether men and women are equal or whether blacks and whites are equal. The western world has had their share of civil rights movements and the growth of feminism—forces that are also starting to send reverberations across Africa.

It is critical to highlight the distinction between “sex” and “gender”.  Whenever we use the term “male” or “female”, we are referring to categories of “sex” —these are biological distinctions similar across societies.  As a result of these biological differences between men and women, society has constructed “gender”. When we talk about “masculine” or “feminine” traits, we are floating in the realms of “gender”.  Gender is a social construct encompassing social norms, expectations and roles that are associated with men or women. The war on women is therefore often waged on the frontline of “gender”.

Africa has for decades faced the challenge of coming to terms with the double edged sword of assimilation of western ideals on women emancipation or initiate a grass-roots evolution. Opponents have exploited this narrative to staunchly defend elements of culture that have been harmful to women. They have branded such movements as a “revolution” inspired by activists from the west rather than “evolution” of cultural forces within society. They view the waves of change as foreign, requiring our cultures to adopt, replicate, replace and assimilate.

Historically, every society has come a long way in recognizing gender equality.  The western world is on a similar path further up the road but still far from the destination with lingering social and economic inequality for women.  Women working in the United States still endure a wage gap— earning 77 cents for every dollar men earn for the same work.  Though I believe that Africa has made significant progress in forging a more equitable society, we are still far from the halfway mark. The fear to attack and challenge traditional culture has left many frustrated and kept this movement at a snail pace. Africa is a very diverse continent with unique tribes and cultural practices but there is no question that women’s rights have been infringed upon across the board.

It is not unique to Africa that a majority of societies had a patriarchal system in place which meant that challenging the status quo would significantly tilt the power balance. Advocates of women emancipation often faced major push-back and resistance from the leadership hierarchy that always felt threatened by the waves of change. Inevitably the more society changed the less influential the traditional structures have become which has allowed numerous practices that disenfranchised women to extinct. In Africa, women have been able to climb the leadership ladder to the point of assuming the presidency. This is a rather fascinating reversal of fortunes considering women were not allowed to eat chicken and eggs in some of our tribes not so long ago.

While some women have been able to leap the hurdles and hunt from the same bushes as the men, others continue to be drowned by the social norms and expectations supported by cultural dogma.  Women who have expanded their roles into bread-winners are still expected “by culture” to return home and head to the kitchen among other domestic chores. In fact in some of the cultures it is frowned upon for a woman to let their man cook a meal.  I believe every family has the right to define their roles. However, culture should not be the reason why a woman is restricted to the narrow mindedness of gender roles. Women have the right just as men do to pursue their dreams to the fullest of their potential without the shackles of traditional culture hanging on their ankles.

Women not only struggle with their work in society going un-recognized, they are also often denied property rights through inheritance. This issue has somewhat been minimized by the power of education that has enabled women to earn their own income from which they can purchase and own property. However, when it comes to the traditional norms of inheritance, women usually don’t count. Inheritance in many African cultures is still tied to manhood. In fact most widows find themselves entangled in property and land-fights with in-laws simply because they are female. Many women are evicted and lose their livelihood.  The fact that culture has instructed women to be submissive and dependent on men is un-acceptable and has to be reformed.

The struggle for the emancipation of women is beneficial to society as a whole. It is high time we recognized that there is a correlation between gender equality and the level of economic and social development of a nation. When women are educated, empowered and have control over resources, there is less poverty, lower infant mortality rates, decreased early pregnancies, improvement in family health, decreased vulnerability to rape and HIV infection and overall improvement in economic growth.  The emancipation of women should not be viewed as an attack on traditional culture. It should be embraced as a path our society needs to take to climb out of poverty and create a more equitable environment. Government has a role to play in enacting policies that protect the rights of women as individuals against abuses. As a society we also have to be vigilant and challenge traditional norms that disenfranchise women.

© Kawuma



Kony 2012 Criticism Muddled by Complexities of Humanitarian Intervention

Kony 2012 is a movement that once again reminds us of the growing power of social media in the electronic age. This campaign has successfully re-introduced to the world “Kony” the notorious leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA). Though Kony and his rebel group were flushed out of Uganda, he is still at large in the Central African Republic and a wanted man by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for horrific crimes committed against humanity during two decades of guerilla warfare. The group Invisible Children has suddenly sprung to fame and garnered tremendous support across the world to capture and prosecute Kony but has also reignited among the critics, the historically contentious debate surrounding the pillars of sovereignty and non intervention.Image

“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” Sir Winston Churchill

Though I agree with those words of wisdom, it is imperative that we highlight the difference between constructive criticism and misguided criticism. The non-intervention argument can easily be won by restrictionists feeding off the fatigue and lost appetite by the international community for interventions made in pursuit of national interests masquerading as humanitarian intervention. Selective-response and prosecution of leaders who have committed crimes against humanity is also a legitimate criticism of humanitarian intervention—and has for long been branded as a weapon that the strong will use against the weak. This sobering reality of David losing to Goliath in international relations should not however be used as a pretext to allow states to abuse human rights while hiding under the umbrella of sovereignty.

“If humanitarian intervention is, indeed, an unacceptable assault on sovereignty, how should we respond to a Rwanda, to a Srebrenica, to gross and systematic violation of human rights that offend every precept of our common humanity?”  Kofi Annan

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. Restrictionists forget that non-intervention has often left the world chanting “never again” after millions were massacred in Rwanda, “never again” after millions lost their lives in Darfur (Sudan), “never again” following the massive genocide in Srebrenica (Bosnia), “never again” as millions perished in Cambodia and with the Syrian government currently wiping out civilians, you would never know that the international community said “never again”. Whenever we blow the trumpets of African solutions to African problems and fly the flag of Pan-Africanism in protest of foreign intervention—we forget that among us are leaders who have betrayed the responsibility to protect their citizens. Sovereignty is not a license to kill citizens without consequences. Failure to defend and uphold human rights is unacceptable and the global community has a moral responsibility to protect.

Critics of Kony 2012 undermine a historic movement that gives people hope and courage to overcome tyranny. There is a difference between “citizen led” and “nation state” driven humanitarian initiatives– with state actors often driven by national interests. President Franklin D Roosevelt (FDR) once met with a group of activists who were seeking his support for bold legislation. After the activists made their closing arguments, FDR stated that, “You have convinced me. Now go out and make me do it.” The Invisible Children activist movement is following this template exposing Kony and effectively swaying public opinion. They have inspired millions of people and created the political will for the global hegemony to pursue a foreign policy defending values– beyond the realms of national interests. Calling Kony 2012 a scum is reckless and misguided rhetoric. Children were abducted and turned into child soldiers; thousands were tortured, raped and killed. A successful movement to point out the atrocities committed by Kony is a victory for human rights that should be celebrated.

“Pessimism becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; it reproduces itself by crippling our willingness to act.” Howard Zimm

Humanitarian intervention is a complex subject but we should understand that the end-goal is to preserve and protect human rights. Pessimism and disagreement on how we should go about it, what should or shouldn’t have been mentioned in a 30 minute video is a conversation worth having but should never be used as a pretext to undermine efforts to curb injustice.  African solutions to African problems should be and engine to drive political will and not a protest anthem for foreign intervention while millions are massacred under-the watchful eyes of our nations and regional organizations. Let Kony 2012 be a call to action for Africans to mobilize domestic support, find a cause and make the injustices happening in their communities and nations visible. Go out and make your leaders take action.  Doing nothing and complaining while others persevere to make a difference makes us part of the problem and not the solution. Our interests are better served by taking into consideration the interests of others. We are tired of saying “never again” once again.

© Kawuma

Africa denied the Power of “AND” by Ice Sculpture Politics

On numerous occasions we have listened to our leaders emphatically state that Africa is not ready for democracy. This protracted feast of political rhetoric has culminated in African nations being governed under the tyranny of the “OR” paradigm while being denied the alternate path of “AND” thinking.  Authoritarian leaders have played this tune to perfection convincing the public that they have to choose the lesser of the two evils, authoritarian rule “OR” under-development; lack of individual liberty “OR” lawlessness; censorship “OR” genocide; life-presidency “OR” instability.

“When you choose the lesser of two evils, always remember that it is still an evil.”—Max Lerner

African leaders have offered us a false choice between Scylla and Charybdis and we have blindly bought into this myth.  With the public trapped behind the cages of ignorance, regimes have the ability to control and distort information while consolidating power at will. Africans have to be cognizant of the “AND” paradigm which offers a more sustainable platform for progress.  “AND” thinking opens up possibilities that in Africa, we can simultaneously have democracy “AND” development; liberty “AND” peace; freedom of expression “AND” order; presidential term-limits/power change “AND” stability.Image

The failure to harness the power of “AND” thinking has been one of the major setbacks that has trapped Africa in a cesspool.  We have succumbed to the short term rewards of the “OR” paradigm protecting the ‘devil we know’ because they will scratch our back in return. In the process Africa has been a breeding ground for fragile democracies and autocracies. The blueprint involves destruction of social and political institutions that could engage mass participation and enable democracy and opposing voices to thrive.  “AND” thinking is powerful and threatens the core principles of authoritarian leaderships. This paradigm offers people the choice to engage in the political process, hold their leaders accountable, believe in a government that works and creates opportunity for all, flourish in a climate of certainty that offers limitless potential for economic growth, innovation and  long term sustainable institutions.

African nations stuck in the “OR” paradigm have succumbed to ice sculpture politics. Like the ice sculpture that only remains intact under very cold conditions, ice sculpture politics are stable under very controlled and restrictive conditions. In such a nation, people are prohibited from freedom of speech, freedom of demonstration, wide spread censorship, opposition politics are severely suppressed, separation of powers is nonexistent and there is always one authoritarian figure holding the reins of power. Such single-season systems of governance are vulnerable to significant changes in political climate— the ice-sculpture inevitably melts. Whenever the power of the authoritarian figure is threatened under such a system, the integrity of the entire political apparatus is compromised. Egypt and Libya are the most recent examples of ice sculpture politics that are melting to the core as a result of fallen regimes.

The characteristic feature of the “AND” paradigm is a guarantee of iron sculpture politics. It offers a structure that can withstand unpredictable forces within a nation.  A system that offers policies and institutions that permit long-term peace, stability and liberty. This is the foundation from which many of the western governments flourish while their counterparts in Africa cyclically crash to the ground whenever one of the authoritarian leaders is ousted from power. Power change does not destabilize nations that practice iron sculpture politics. If our governments have any hope of transforming the fate of our nations to achieve better outcomes, they have to embrace the “AND” paradigm and refrain from the tyranny of “OR”.  Failure to change course will continue to condemn African nations on the perilous path of showcasing ice sculpture politics.

© Kawuma

Relevant Education the key to Education Reform in Africa

Education has for long been branded as the key to unlock Africa from the cages of poverty. Significant resources have been invested by the UN, NGOs and African Nations towards solving Category 1 challenges which Dr. Kawuma defines as (1) Lack of access to Education (2) Gender inequality (3) Poor/inadequate facilities and the widening teacher to student ratio. However, “lack of relevant education” which is hurting Africa the most has not been addressed. Resources are being wasted trying to get every child in school but the majority graduate and leave school without getting an education. Many return to their communities as misfits unable to prosper and take advantage of the resources in the community. Dr. Kawuma proposes an education model that focuses on the needs of society and keeping students engaged with their culture and society.

South African Musical Icon Hugh Masekela Is Coming To The Dakota Jazz Club

Bra Hugh Rampolo Masekela

by Nelima

Bra Hugh Masekela is a musical genius who plays the trumpet, trombone, flugelhorn and cornet; he is a great singer and composer as well as a master storyteller, activist and history teacher (by way of his music).

At 72 he is still going strong and will be performing two shows a day on Feb 15th and Feb 16th at The Dakota Jazz Club and Restaurant. You really do not want to miss this.

Especially since you get a $10.00 discount off your tickets if you use the code name ‘MinneAfrica’ :-)

We will again be running a lottery to give away 2 pairs of tickets to the 9:00pm shows. Email your full name and phone numbers to www.minneafrica@gmail.com to be entered into the lottery. We will run the lottery at 6pm Monday Feb 13th so have your info to us by then.

General info:

7pm shows are $40.00

9pm shows are $30.00

Continue reading

Re: You Lazy (Intellectual) African Scum!

Whenever the term “intellectual” is sandwiched between “Lazy” and “African Scum”, there is a high likelihood of public backlash. However, Field Ruwe skillfully  threads the needle to deliver a candid and thought provoking article  dissecting a conversation he had with Walter a former International Monetary Fund (IMF) agent in Zambia. The gist of the article can be summed up as a pep-talk for African intellectuals to utilize their knowledge, expertise and resources to advance their societies.

Africans have for decades fought and demonstrated the desire to be on a path to prosperity. We are always grateful and eager to partner with comrades who can offer meaningful support and sincere advice  with the capacity and tools to leap existing barriers. Africa has for long been viewed as a continent with a lot of potential and resources but lacking a spark and leadership to unlock the immense human capital.

What I find hypocritical and indefensible about the character of Walter is the notion that he lambasts the “lazy” generation of African intellectuals for not cleaning the well from which they drink while he is dumping toxic waste in it. He is still eager to return to Africa under the umbrella of an organization with the same agenda as the IMF to further exploit the same Africans he appears to care immensely about.

“I was part of the IMF group that came to rip you guys off.” He smirked.

This is not an attempt to defend the ineptitude of African intellectuals that Walter candidly points out. We certainly have a lot of work to do. However, it would be foolhardy to down-play the impact of  expatrImageiates that have for long baited Africa with the “Carrot and stick” “Give me an African president, just one, who has not fallen for the carrot and stick.” Says Walter.

The “Carrot and stick” is a technique of managing people and inducing behavior by combining the two principles of motivation “reward” and “punishment”. This strategy was historically utilized by cart drivers; they would dangle a carrot in front of a mule (always out of reach) while also holding a stick behind the mule.  The mule had two options, either it follows the positive reinforcement of attempting to reach and bite the carrot and in the process draw the cart or resort to negative reinforcement when the driver whipped it with a stick and the fear of the excruciating pain forced the mule to move forward. Walter confesses that the organizations he works for including the IMF have been employing such hard-handed tactics to manage African leaders and in the process gaining control and influence over resources and national affairs.

“I work for the broker that has acquired a chunk of your debt. Your government owes not the World Bank, but us millions of dollars. We’ll be in Lusaka to offer your president a couple of millions and fly back with a check twenty times greater.” Continue reading

Why Mob-Justice Is On A Rise In Africa

The pinnacle of the values of a society is reflected in its justice system.  A platform from which a society defines morality, revenge, punishment and forgiveness.  Every society has guidelines in place to deal with perpetrators and these guidelines evolve with time.  Historically, crime in many African societies was viewed as a private matter between the affected kinships.  Gifts would often be sent to the family of the affected individual(s) seeking forgiveness.  When the ‘gift option’ failed, blood feuds often emerged with retribution in form of an ‘eye for an eye’ or worse.  Other forms of punishment included banishment/disowning of individuals from the clan, family or community depending on the severity of the crime or disgraceful conduct.  Disownment was the ultimate punishment at that time since all the descendants of that family branch would have a curse bestowed upon them. These components of justice had similarities to those of ancient Greece and the middle ages.

As society grew and communities became more organized with a hierarchical leadership structure, justice was transferred from the control of the private citizens to a centralized system. The concept of laws became common with legislators, enforcers and executioners of punishment. An impartial centralized justice system was meant to protect the rights of the perpetrators while also preventing the victims from seeking vengeance beyond proportional justice. The emergence of kingdoms and chiefdoms resulted into adoption of a complex justice system rooted in culture, customs and taboos. This was eventually replaced by the English common law system adopted in the post-colonial era. Under this system, one was innocent until proven guilty and actus reus( act of wrong doing) and mens rea (intent/culpable state of mind)were paramount to proving criminality beyond a reasonable doubt. Continue reading